I’m not surprised.
There is an awful lot of ‘he-said this’, ‘she said that’ kinda stuff in the fitness world.
By that I mean, that no matter what kind of question you may have about the subject,
… you’ll end up hearing very differing answers, depending on whom you ask.
So, lets say ‘newbie A’ wants to know about weight training…
She’ll ask trainer #1 a question like: “Can you burn more fat with weights than with cardio” – and voila!
The answer given is very simple, very cut and dried: NO, “cardio burns more fat“.
For some reason, now, she gets around to asking Trainer #2 the same question …
The answer given is very simple, very cut and dried: YES, “weight training burns more fat”.
Now, ‘newbie A’ is very confused.
Who/what to believe?
Hmmmmm…… that’s a tricky one.
I’ll explain it the way I see it…
…………………… and then you can take it or leave it.
‘Cause basically…, that’s how it works.
there’s always a cutting edge study being done at some University somewhere,
studying everything from what amino acid gives rats the biggest boost on the treadmill,
to whether bananas are good for erectile deficiency.. ( or just erectile replacement )
And it never fails,
.. the results conflict with a least one of the previous studies on the same subject,
done at some other University. ( sometimes – the same one! )
Anyone who has any experience with the ‘scientific method’ understands something about why that is….
… any kind of variation in the test conditions can mean completely different results.
And these variations can be minute –
— testing muscles from a rat’s leg instead of body,
— testing well-trained athletes instead of newbies,
— or whether an amino acid being tested is administered with, or without, a particular enzyme.
But, that’s only the beginning –
— you can’t really say that your average trainer is a voracious reader, exactly.
When they do read, most read very short blurbs or extracts of studies…
— and these, they may interpret differently– or miss the point of the study results entirely.
Many trainers havent picked up a book or read a study since their certification.
So, a lot of times, they’re operating on outdated information.
Stretching, for instance.
If you were certified (like me) in the late 80’s or early 90’s,
you might still think that 30 to 45 minutes of stretching is a good thing before heavy lifting, even though more recent studies have shown it reduces power and strength, and increases susceptibility to certain types of injuries.
And it’s like that across the board.
so, again… what can you do to insure you’re getting good info?
I think the answer is to read everything you can get your hands on,
— try out different ways of doing things,
— and then adding the ones that you like and you feel are working into your regimen.
Because every body is different , and what works for subject 28,737 might not work for you.
No matter what the study says.